Sinceits inception 200 years ago, homeopathy has been treated as an alternative tothe usual conventional medicine and science has kept a respectable distancefrom it since it does not seem to pose any harm. Its apparent resurgence inthese times has rekindled the discussion as to whether homeopathic medicationsare an effective treatment against disease or whether they are no more than anelaborate placebo. The discussion as to whether or not it is an effective therapyis ongoing in human and veterinary medicine; it appears to have devolved intoone between proponents of homeopathy and those who rely on firm evidence ofeffectiveness before adopting any therapy.
SinceFood and Drug Administration has decided to conduct a two-day review ofregulations on homeopathy, science has stepped forward to take the place of ajury. Experts are convinced that to be able to definitely know the effectivenessof homeopathy, it should undergo clinical trials.
Homeopathyis a $6.4 billion business in the United States alone where only 10% of itscitizens are into this practice. How much more would it be in Europe where theBritish royal family have publicly announced its support of homeopathy andGermany have mandated all school curricula to include homeopathy in itsteaching? Same question goes to Asia where homeopathy is a mainstream in Indiaand experts are more on call in Jakarta,Indonesia and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia than physicians are.
Afterdecades of ignoring these products, drug regulators are finally asking hardquestions about what has long been derided by mainstream doctors and scientistsas quack medicine. Yet, a lot of homeopathic experts still believe that thepractice needs not to undergo medical testing as it already has science behindit. Complaints of fraudulenceare also non-valid if people really want to find science explanation on itsfunction.
Accordingto the Peterson Group, one ofthe leading sources of information on alternative, complementary andintegrative medicines, there is science in homeopathy. There is actuallyconsiderably more laboratory and clinical research on homeopathic medicine thanmost people realize. It is important to first note that its founder, Samuel Hahnemannwas a physicist himself.
Oneof the most famous studies is called Arndt-Schulz law which explains that weakstimuli accelerate physiological activity, medium stimuli inhibit physiologicalactivity, and strong stimuli halt physiological activity. To explain for instance, it is widelyrecognized that normal medical doses of atropine block the parasympathetic nerves,causing mucous membranes to dry up, while exceedingly small doses of atropinecause increased secretions to mucous membranes.